State-Owned Works of Art Risk Seizure to Satisfy $7b of Claims by Americans

The Bronx Museum has postponed an exhibition showcasing Cuban artwork on loan by the National Museum of Fine Arts in Havana (“MNBA) following delayed arrangements by Cuba. The joint initiative between the two galleries titled “Wild Noise” originally planned to host two exhibitions that would exchange works of art between nations. The first installment of American art displayed in Havana took place last summer. Cuba, however, is now reluctant in loaning the State-owned collection to The Bronx Museum fearing that it will never be returned once in the hands of Americans.

Regardless of the numerous cultural regulations that were lifted by the Obama administration, artwork subject to US certified claims against Cuba can still be confiscated the moment it lands on American soil.

Mauricio Tamargo, Former Chairman of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission and attorney at PobleteTamargo, discussed the parameters of the embargo and property confiscation with The Art Newspaper stating; “You can’t really have commerce until the embargo is lifted and until Cuba pays compensation to more than 6,000 American claimants.”

“This is the largest confiscation of American property in history. It’s something that can’t be ignored. As much as everybody would like to have normal relations with Cuba, this has to be resolved first.”

– Mauricio Tamargo

Though the State Department has ensured the security of foreign nations’ art at various US museums in the past, in the case of Cuban-owned artwork, “even an executive order from the White House granting the museum immunity from seizure for art on loan from Havana is not an option, since the US president lacks the authority (and probably the will) to override an embargo that has been affirmed by the US Congress,” says Tamargo.

The Bronx Museum still plans on hosting the MNBA collection despite Cuba’s hesitance. In a statement regarding the postponed show they stated; “There has been tremendous and rapid change in a wide range of activities with Cuba; not long ago no one would have imagined that we could have exhibited works from our collection there, as we successfully did in 2015… we are planning for the exhibition at the Bronx Museum in January 2017.”

According to an outside publicist for The Bronx Museum, MNBA’s requests for immunity from confiscation are currently “in process.” Loaned artwork from the state-owned MNBA will be at risk of seizure in the US as long as the US embargo is in place. Only after all of the US property claims have been satisfied, including the return of cultural items and art, will immunity for Cuba’s collection be an option.

The full article in The Art Newspaper can be found here.

“Cuba al día” by Martí News – President Obama’s Cuba Policy

In the June 1 radio episode, Tomas Cardoso and Cary Roque, reporters with Martí News, speak with attorney Jason Poblete on the US embargo towards Cuba and the policy of the Obama administration with analysis of a recent Tampa Bay Times article.

The second part of the program includes commentary from human rights activist Victor Manuel Duenas.

The interview, in Spanish, can be found here

Starwood’s Deal in Cuba Encourages Would-Be Investors

Following the recent deal between Starwood Hotels & Resorts and the Government of Cuba facilitating the operation of three hotels in Havana, speculation quickly arose as to the status of the hotel company’s claim against the island nation. Earlier this year, the resort signed two management contracts with three Cuban military enterprises which control Cuba’s tourism industry. According to an article in Bloomberg BNA, the Cuban military will serve as the owners and majority partners in the Havana locations as Starwood takes on renovations of the three hotels in Havana.

The article goes on to describe the optimism amongst entrepreneurs in both the hospitality and agricultural industries in future business ventures with the Castro regime. The Office of Foreign Asset Control gave Starwood the required authorization necessary under the embargo to sign the deal. Whether the Hotel’s claim against Cuba has changed, however, remains unknown as all parties involved refused comment to Bloomberg journalists.

The Starwood claim is the 10th largest certified claim against the government of Cuba, authorized by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission. Mauricio Tamargo, attorney at PobleteTamargo, and former chairman of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, who certified the hotel’s claim during the second program through the State Department, says that “the US government shouldn’t facility any other business opportunities on the island until the Cuban government agrees to pay the certified claims in full.”

“We’ve passed the point of unrestricted concessions to the Cuban government,” Tamargo, of the law firm PobleteTamargo LLP, told Bloomberg BNA. “We need to focus on a settlement of these claims, as the law calls for.”

“The pieces of a deal are in place now to make a deal, but once Obama leaves office, I think it changes and it might be a different kind of deal,” Tamargo said. “And I think the Cubans might not like the deal that may follow.”

The article in Bloomberg BNA can be read here.

The FAA Reauthorization Act 2016: The Future of Drone Regulations

Senator John Thune (R-SD) said the FAA “will be better able to grant permission for new and safe drone usage” as a result of this new law. A federally authorized drone program appears to have support from UAS industry companies. Supporters of this approach believe business ventures would become less complex should interstate commerce, such as delivery services, become implemented. The bill specifically approves commercial drone flights during night-time hours which advocates have praised as it allows for further innovation in commercial and delivery drone services.The legislation also calls for increased funding to be used in keeping drones away from airports and enforcement of drone regulations.

Critics of the bill, such as Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), proposed eliminating language that gives FAA authority over state regulations. Though she supported the bill as a whole, she strongly opposes specific rules that would prohibit local and state safety laws. Feinstein spoke out against the bill stating, “Reckless drone use varies significantly in different states and even within a state, which is why we need to maintain the ability for states to set their own standards of drone operation.”

PobleteTamargo attorney, Jason Poblete says, “As the State and Federal government jockey to regulate the industry, UAS operators, as well as manufacturers, should closely monitor these developments.”

The House version of FAA Reauthorization legislation has been stalled for some time now. Many reports point to disagreements over a proposal by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee that would privatize air traffic control operations and place it under a non-profit corporation. This proposal was left out of the version passed by the Senate.

The debate will no doubt continue as research continues on UAS technologies as well as applications. Should companies begin utilizing cross-state delivery services via UAS, the regulatory landscape may drastically change and new safety and privacy concerns will likely develop. Regardless of support or opposition over FAA authority, the bill includes many provisions which outline further research and program development that will benefit the aviation sector as well as the general population.

More information on the Senate’s plans for the future of aviation can be found on the Senate Committee for Commerce, Science and Transportation’s summary of FAA Reauthorization.

The full text of the FAA Reauthorization Bill can be found here.

See Sec. 2124 for information on the effects on state and local regulations.

 

USCIRF On Religious Freedom in Cuba

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has released it’s annual reports on the state of Religious Freedom throughout the globe. Countries are broken into three categories, Tier 1, Tier 2 and Other countries of interest based on the level of concern for religious liberties. Cuba is considered a Tier 2 country, along with other nations such as Afghanistan, Russia and Turkey. 

In the most recent findings on religious freedom conditions in Cuba, USCIRF found that increased government intervention and threats to permanently close and demolish church properties created a significant deterioration of religious liberties on the island. 

As stated in the report; “While the Cuban constitution guarantees freedom of religion or belief, this protection is limited by other constitutional and legal provisions.” In the discussion of continued targeting and harassment of independent religious communities, USCIRF makes note of the Cuban governments relentless persecution of the Apostolic Movement. Targeted harassment includes; “short-term arrests of leaders; government-organized mob attacks; confiscations, destruction of, or threats to destroy church property; harassment and surveillance of church members and their relatives; fines on churches; and threats to leaders and members of loss of employment, housing or educational opportunities.” 

Especially concerning is the continued harassment of Apostolic Reformation Revered Yiorvis Bravo Denis. The government of Cuba continues their attempts in seizing his family home and church. We are particularly pleased the USCIRF has taken notice of Reverend Bravo’s case and continue to urge the OAS to take action on our request.

Attorneys with PobleteTamargo LLP represent Reverend Bravo Denis and the Apostolic Movement of Cuba before the Organization of American States (OAS)’s Inter-American Commission for Human Rights (IACHR).

The full report on Cuba can be read here.