Trump’s Cuba squeeze renews fight over $9 billion property claims

From Bloomberg News (March 17, 2026):

Even if the regime in Havana were to fall, “there is no way to untangle the knot that is the disaster of the Cuban economic system without resolving these cases,” said Mauricio Tamargo, a lawyer with Poblete Tamargo LLP and former chairman of the U.S. Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, the government body that verifies such cases. “These expropriations are at the core of Cuba’s economic problems.

Read the Bloomberg story, Trump’s Cuba squeeze renews fight over $9 billion property claims.

Cuba & Caribbean Update: General Sanctions Outlook and Practical Risk Mitigation Tips

Dear Clients and Colleagues,

Recent reporting and policy signals regarding Cuba and the broader Caribbean indicate continued volatility in sanctions rather than near-term normalization.

While headlines may suggest “stabilization” or renewed dialogue between the U.S. and Cuba, the underlying enforcement and compliance environment remains dynamic—particularly for shipping, energy-adjacent trade, and counterparties with any Cuba nexus.

Our near-term assessment is straightforward:

U.S. pressure is currently being applied through practical chokepoints—most notably oil, shipping, and logistics. As a result, we expect heightened scrutiny, episodic tightening, and increased operational friction before any meaningful easing occurs.

As recent events in Venezuela demonstrated, low-probability, high-impact developments in the region can materialize quickly, shifting enforcement posture and creating immediate knock-on effects for shipping, insurance, and transactional compliance.

What this means for stakeholders engaged in transactions in the region (0–90 days):

  • Enhanced diligence around vessel routing, cargo origin, transshipment points, and counterparties touching Cuba or Cuba-adjacent trade.
  • Increased risk of payment delays, blocked funds, or last-minute shipping disruptions, even for companies not directly operating in Cuba.
  • Continued uncertainty for insurers, carriers, and financial institutions assessing Caribbean exposure.

Looking ahead (3–12 months):


Any policy adjustment—if it occurs—is likely to be phased, conditional, and verification-driven, not a broad or immediate rollback of sanctions. Statutory constraints remain firmly in place, and informal diplomatic signals should not be treated as authorization to comply.

Recommended risk-mitigation steps (not exhaustive):

  • Review and update sanctions clauses in contracts (termination, force majeure, representations on origin and beneficial ownership).
  • Refresh internal screening for Cuba nexus risk, including ports, intermediaries, freight forwarders, vessels, and insurers.
  • Tighten documentation and payment controls to reduce exposure to blocked or delayed transactions.
  • Establish clear internal escalation protocols for transactions presenting indirect or emerging Cuba-related risk.

Training note:  In our experience, many compliance lapses arise not from bad intent, but from outdated assumptions or uneven internal understanding.  In the Cuba scenario, and others, we continue to see value in short, practical training refreshers for legal, compliance, logistics, finance, and commercial teams—focused on current Cuba/Caribbean risk signals, common failure points, and how to spot issues early before they become enforcement problems.

We will continue to monitor developments and provide targeted updates as conditions evolve. Please contact us if you would like a transaction-specific or sector-specific assessment (shipping, agriculture, energy-adjacent trade, or financial services).


This post is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its facts. Poblete Tamargo is a boutique national security law and public policy practice advising clients on complex matters, including complex consular matters, wrongful detention by foreign governments, economic sanctions, export controls, and congressional oversight. We also counsel employers and travelers on compliant travel planning, documentation, and government engagement strategies. To discuss a specific situation, contact our team.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Launches Mandatory Forced Labor Portal – Immediate Impact on Import Reviews

Dear Colleagues,

Last week, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced the official launch of the Forced Labor Portal, a new centralized online system that is now mandatory for submitting certain forced-labor–related review requests.

Effective as of January 21, 2026, importers and their representatives must use this Portal to submit the following requests to CBP:

  • Withhold Release Order (WRO) admissibility reviews
  • Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) applicability reviews
  • UFLPA exception requests
  • CAATSA (North Korea–related) exception requests

CBP has made clear that email or paper submissions will no longer be accepted for these matters. Requests submitted outside the Portal may result in delays or outright rejection.

The Forced Labor Portal is intended to centralize review intake and assign matters to the appropriate CBP office (Forced Labor Division, Port of Entry, or Center of Excellence and Expertise).

All users must authenticate through LOGIN.gov, and both primary and secondary points of contact must have active LOGIN.gov accounts.

Why this matters:

Detentions and exclusions tied to forced labor enforcement already carry tight deadlines and heavy evidentiary burdens. The Portal adds a new procedural layer that, if not handled correctly, can itself become a point of failure. Incomplete submissions, improper document formatting, or delays in Portal registration can jeopardize admissibility reviews and exception requests.

Recommended next steps for importers:

  • Confirm that your internal teams and outside brokers understand the new Portal requirement
  • Ensure relevant personnel have active LOGIN.gov credentials
  • Review your forced labor response playbooks, including document readiness and translation protocols
  • Identify products, suppliers, or regions that may trigger UFLPA, WRO, or CAATSA scrutiny

Poblete Tamargo LLP regularly advises clients on compliance with federal trade laws and regulations and can assist with reviewing and preparing submissions through the Forced Labor Portal.  If you have questions about how this change affects your operations—or if you are facing an active detention or exclusion—we are available to assist.


This post is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its facts. Poblete Tamargo is a boutique national security law and public policy practice advising clients on complex matters, including complex consular matters, wrongful detention by foreign governments, economic sanctions, export controls, and congressional oversight. We also counsel employers and travelers on compliant travel planning, documentation, and government engagement strategies. To discuss a specific situation, contact our team.

Travel Preparedness Series #2: INTERPOL (Am I On the List?)

By Mike Rodriguez, Senior Policy Advisor

Last week, we introduced INTERPOL: what it is, and what it is not. In this update, we’re sharing a practical note for anyone who has reason to believe they may be the subject of an INTERPOL notice (including a Red Notice). Treat this as a travel risk and address it before you board a plane.

First, talk to counsel. 

Your team at Poblete Tamargo has handled matters involving the misuse of INTERPOL channels and other global alert systems. We’ve seen how certain travelers—dissidents, business leaders, journalists, political activists, and others with cross-border exposure (including business owners)—can face elevated risk depending on the jurisdictions involved.

Second, check what is publicly available.

INTERPOL maintains a public notices database, and we review it regularly on behalf of clients. A critical caution: not all notices are public, so a clean result online does not guarantee you’re in the clear.

Third, consider formal inquiries through the right channels.

Engaging U.S. and foreign authorities (and, in some cases, a Ministry of Justice) can be intimidating and easy to mishandle without experience.  We can make informed, measured inquiries on your behalf and, where appropriate, submit requests to INTERPOL’s Commission for the Control of Files (CCF) in Lyon, France, to determine whether a notice or related data exists. Even when INTERPOL does not share details, in some cases it can still be worth making the request and putting relevant parties on notice.

Fourth, until you have clarity, avoid international travel if you have a reasonable basis to believe you are being targeted.

If you travel while flagged, you may face detention, secondary screening, or an extradition process at a border—sometimes triggered by imperfect or outdated information.  When in doubt, come to us for guidance.

Fifth, if travel is unavoidable, prepare your documentation like it actually matters—before you board a plane or boat (because it does).

We can help you assemble and audit a travel packet tailored to your situation, including up-to-date contact information for your Poblete Tamargo point of contact and—when relevant—immigration documentation, residency evidence, and any visas or home-country documents for non-U.S. nationals.

Finally, if you believe a notice is unjust or abusive, there are procedures to challenge it.  Reach out to your team at Poblete Tamargo to explore challenge it on your behalf.  The process is technical and fact-specific, but the key point is simple: you don’t want your first “notification” to happen at passport control.

Taking these steps early can reduce risk, protect your rights, and help prevent a preventable crisis—especially one that could needlessly escalate into wrongful detention or worse.

Travel AWARE and travel SAFE!


About the Author

Miguel “Mike” E. Rodriguez is a Senior Policy Advisor with Poblete Tamargo LLP, focusing on U.S. immigration matters, including consular processing, employment-based immigration, Cuban migration/mass migration, and refugee issues. He brings two decades of experience from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, where he coordinated USCIS engagement with Congress and served as a principal point of contact on Cuba-related inquiries, among other roles.


This post is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its facts. Poblete Tamargo is a boutique national security law and public policy practice advising clients on complex matters, including complex consular matters, wrongful detention by foreign governments, economic sanctions, export controls, and congressional oversight. We also counsel employers and travelers on compliant travel planning, documentation, and government engagement strategies. To discuss a specific situation, contact our team.

🚀 From Markets to Outer Space Policy?  New Report on U.S. Outer Space Influence 🚀

(Space Coast, Florida) The Washington, DC think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has released a new report examining what it describes as a decline in U.S. space influence and proposing steps to reassert leadership—particularly in response to China’s expanding footprint in the so-called “Global South.”   You can read the CSIS report here.  

While framed as strategic recommendations, we found that several of the proposals raise important legal, commercial, and policy considerations for U.S. companies operating in or adjacent to the space sector.

Key CSIS Recommendations

The report advances three principal ideas:

  1. Integrating NASA capabilities into international development efforts;
  2. Expanding financing for space projects in developing markets; and
  3. Reserving portions of U.S. commercial launch capacity for Global South partners.

Why This Matters to Companies in this Market

From a legal and commercial perspective, these proposals are notable for what they imply:

  • Shift from market-driven to policy-directed allocation: Reserving commercial launch capacity for non-U.S. partners would mark a departure from the largely market-based approach that has fueled U.S. launch dominance. Clients should anticipate renewed debates over government direction versus commercial freedom in launch services.
  • Blurring civil, commercial, and development lines: Tying NASA capabilities to international development raises questions about mission creep, statutory authorities, and how civil space assets may be leveraged for foreign-policy objectives—potentially affecting procurement, partnerships, and compliance obligations.
  • Increased regulatory and political risk: Financing and capacity set-asides tied to geopolitical goals may introduce additional layers of export controls, sanctions screening, and political conditionality, particularly for companies engaging with emerging space actors.
  • Competitive implications: U.S. firms could face indirect pressure to subsidize strategic objectives through pricing, capacity constraints, or partnership requirements that do not necessarily align with commercial realities.

Our Preliminary Take


The report discusses a broader policy current: a growing willingness in Washington to use space commerce as an instrument of foreign policy.

Whether these recommendations gain traction will depend on congressional appetite, executive-branch priorities, and resistance from a commercial sector that has thrived precisely because it was not centrally planned.

Clients involved in launch services, satellite operations, space-adjacent financing, or international partnerships should closely monitor developments. Early engagement—both legally and strategically—will be critical if these ideas begin to move from think-tank paper to policy proposal.

We will continue to track developments and assess their implications for compliance, contracts, and risk exposure. Please reach out if you would like to discuss how these trends may affect your operations or planning.


This post is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Each case turns on its facts. Poblete Tamargo is a boutique national security law and public policy practice advising clients on complex matters, including complex consular matters, wrongful detention by foreign governments, economic sanctions, export controls, and congressional oversight. We also counsel employers and travelers on compliant travel planning, documentation, and government engagement strategies. To discuss a specific situation, contact our team.