New U.S.-Cuba Sanctions Regulations – A Reminder To Conduct Due Diligence

The new regulations implement the changes to the Cuba sanctions program that were announced in June 2017 as part of President Trump’s National Security Presidential Memorandum on Cuba.[ii]

The OFAC regulations that went into effect on November 9, 2017, among other things, prohibits persons subject to U.S. law from doing business with certain entities and sectors of the Cuban government. This prohibition includes companies listed in the new U.S. State Department Cuba Restricted and Sub-entities list.[iii] If you, or your company, engage in any transactions in Cuba, these new prohibitions likely apply to you.

In accordance with President Trump’s new Cuba policy, one of the changes includes the State Department’s List of Restricted Entities and Sub-entities Associated with Cuba (“Cuba Restricted List”). The Cuba Restricted List is intended to assist the CACR by listing certain government agencies that persons subject to U.S. law are prohibited from conducting business transactions, without prior U.S. government authorization or not at all.

This prohibition extends to and includes hotels, marinas, and other entities that are connected with those Cuban government agencies included on the list. The Cuba Restricted List puts persons subject to U.S. law on notice to avoid the aforementioned Cuban government agencies and their holdings. According to U.S. government officials the list will be revised periodically, with updates published in the Federal Register.

One of the less obvious questions for U.S. businesses involves the issue of dealing with subsidiaries of prohibited entities. This question tends to be very tricky to answer, since there is no general rule of thumb. In fact, the State Department included the following question in the updated Frequently Asked Questions release pertaining to the Cuba Restriction List:

Q. The entity with which I want to transact is not on the Cuba Restricted List, but its parent company is. Can I engage in a direct financial transaction with the sub-entity?

A. Yes. Entities or sub-entities that are owned or controlled by another entity or sub-entity on the Cuba Restricted List are not treated as restricted unless also specified by name on the list.[iv]

Based on this question, and other possible questions, it is important for persons subject to U.S. law, including subsidiaries of foreign companies with offices located in the United States, to seek counsel when planning to do business in Cuba, even if those “sub-entity” companies are not currently on the restricted list. Failure to conduct due diligence can be very costly, both legally and monetarily as well as from a public relations standpoint.

Although the regulations prohibit persons subject to U.S. law from doing business with certain entities, the CACR regulations allow for certain transactions in Cuba, such as those with small Cuban shops and homes including Casa Particulares (“private” residence), Paladares (“private” restaurants) and Cuentapropistas (“privately” owned stores run by self-employed Cubans). In this area, the Trump administration has essentially continued the Obama administration’s policy of closer contact with the people of Cuba while placing more stringent restrictions on support directed towards the government of Cuba.

Regardless of the amendments, or those to come, keep in mind that Cuba remains a nation with a central, command economy. The Cuban government owns an overwhelming percentage of the nation’s businesses or has significant connections to even those deemed “private”. Cuba’s legal definition of a private sector is not the same as in the United States or other free market nations.

Also consider that a majority of the property in Cuba is held “in commons” by the state and for public purposes. Very few individuals have “private property” or small businesses. The few individuals that do own private property have been granted ownership rights based on having good standing with the Communist Party or have met other sets of circumstances outlined under Cuban law.

If you are going to engage in U.S.-authorized transactions in Cuba, chances are you will directly or indirectly be doing business with the Cuban government. One of the challenges for foreign companies doing business in Cuba is making sure that the entities or individuals are not on one of several U.S. government watch lists.

With these new changes to the CACR, it is important to consider the following, if you are planning to engage in Cuba-related transactions:

  • The embargo against Cuba is still in effect;
  • U.S. embargo restrictions apply to U.S. persons, no matter where they are located, anywhere in the world;
  • Non-U.S. companies engaging in transactions in Cuba should take steps to ensure that properties that are the subject of the foreign investments or other business activities are not subject of a certified or other claim held by American citizens. There are exceptions to the unlawful “trafficking” sanctions. Consult an attorney.
  • Implement a system to ensure that you are in compliance with U.S. economic sanctions and export controls toward Cuba.

For more information on the types of services we provide, visit our page on Trade Security matters.



[i] See The Federal Register Notice on November 2017 Amendments to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations: https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/cacr_11082017.pdf

[ii] The “National Security Presidential Memorandum on Strengthening the Policy of the United States Towards Cuba” was released by The White House Office of the Press Secretary on June 16, 2017. See: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/06/16/national-security-presidential-memorandum-strengthening-policy-united

[iii]The State Department’s List of Restricted Entities and Sub-entities Associated with Cuba will be maintained by the State Department and may be periodically updated as necessary in the Federal Register. See: https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/cuba/cubarestrictedlist/275331.htm

[iv] “Frequently Asked Questions on the Cuba Restricted List” published by the State Department Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs on November 8, 2017. See: https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/cuba/cubarestrictedlist/275382.htm

Heartbreaking Stories Emerge as Embassy Mystery Halts Trips From Cuba to Tampa

In response to the health attacks on American Diplomats in Cuba, six weeks ago, the U.S. Embassy in Havana ceased issuing visas to Cubans wishing to come to the United States. As stories of many of those Cubans seeking U.S. visas begin to emerge, PobleteTamargo attorney, Jason Poblete discussed the State Department’s decision in an article published in the Tampa Bay Times.

Poblete explained that it is unfair to place the blame on the United States. The health attacks occurred on Cuban soil and it was up to the Cuban government to protect foreign diplomats.

“If Cuba wants access to the U.S. market, it they want visas, if they want to do business here, Cuba needs to earn that,” Poblete said. “Access to the U.S. market is a privilege, not a right.”

The complete article from the Tampa Bay Times can be read here.

UPDATE 19- Zakka Family Appreciates Efforts By Sen. Cruz And Sen. Leahy, Others

Statement on the Continued Unlawful Detention of

Internet Freedom Advocate & Hostage Nizar Zakka

The Senate today approved S.Res. 245, a bipartisan resolution calling on the Government of Iran to release unjustly detained United States citizens and legal permanent resident aliens, and for other purposes.

On behalf of Mr. Nizar Zakka and his family, Mr. Zakka’s lawyer in the United States, Mr. Jason Poblete, issued the following statement:

“For the first time in years, the U.S. government sent a united and clear message to the Iranian regime that it will no longer tolerate using innocent people such as Nizar Zakka as political leverage. It’s time for responsible parties around the world to step up, follow America’s lead, and strongly urge Iran to release Nizar who remains very sick and who is being refused medical care.”

Last month, President Donald Trump announced a new approach for U.S. Iran policy highlighting, among other things, the unlawful detention of American citizens and U.S. Legal Permanent Residents such as Nizar Zakka. The administration has warned Iran of ‘dire consequences’ if they refuse to release unlawfully detained persons.

On July 26, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a resolution sponsored by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) and Rep. Ted Deutch (D-FL) calling for the unconditional release of United States citizens and legal permanent resident aliens being held for political purposes by the Government of Iran. A similar resolution was approved in the Senate today, sponsored by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT).

Senators Cruz and Leahy issued the following statement on the passage of their bipartisan resolution:

“For years the Iranian regime has brutally detained and imprisoned Americans and dual-nationals as a matter of policy, in an effort to leverage the freedom of our citizens for political concessions,” Sen. Cruz said. “We have a moral imperative to speak for the silenced and shackled, to hold those responsible in Iran to account for detaining and mistreating our people, and to fight for the release and return of those held hostage by the Islamic Republic of Iran. I am glad that today the Senate has voted in support of this vital measure. I will continue to work with my colleagues to ensure the United States safely brings our people back to American soil.”

“There are few more egregious violations of human rights and human dignity than to wrongfully imprison innocent people under harsh conditions for purposes of extortion, which the Government of Iran engages in as a matter of state policy and practice,” Sen. Leahy said. “Baquer Namazi, 80 years old and in failing health, is one of several Iranian-Americans being cruelly abused in this manner.  It is imperative that the Administration uses its diplomatic tools to obtain their freedom.”

Mr. Zakka traveled to Iran in September 2015, at the invitation of Iran’s Vice President for Women and Family Affairs Shahindokht Molaverdi, to speak at a conference on the use of technology and the Internet to promote social, economic, and educational development in the region. After the conference, en route to the airport, Mr. Zakka was taken by persons believed to be associated with the IRGC’s Basij or the intelligence services.

Mr. Zakka has been denied the right to review the charges or evidence against him and his lawyers have not been allowed to mount a proper defense. Despite the ordeal, including psychological and physical torture, Nizar has maintained his innocence.

More information about Mr. Zakka’s case can be found below.

Prior Statements and Releases

UPDATE 18- Statement on the Continued Unlawful Detention of Nizar Zakka

Statement on the Continued Unlawful Detention of Internet Freedom Advocate & Hostage Nizar Zakka

On behalf of Mr. Nizar Zakka and his family, Mr. Zakka’s lawyer in the United States, Mr. Jason Poblete, issued the following statement:

Iran negotiated in bad faith, including using innocent civilians such as Mr. Zakka as political leverage during the JCPOA talks. Unlike the Obama administration, the Congress in two resolutions and President Trump, are refocusing U.S. priorities to include the unconditional release of hostages such as Nizar. Allies should follow America’s lead.

 

Mr. Zakka traveled to Iran in September 2015, at the invitation of Iran’s Vice President for Women and Family Affairs Shahindokht Molaverdi, to speak at a conference on the use of technology and the Internet to promote social, economic, and educational development in the region. After the conference, en route to the airport, Mr. Zakka was taken by persons believed to be associated with the IRGC’s Basij or the intelligence services.

Mr. Zakka has been denied the right to review the charges or evidence against him and his lawyers have not been allowed to mount a proper defense. Despite the ordeal, including psychological and physical torture, Nizar has maintained his innocence. 

More information about Mr. Zakka’s case and the resolutions introduced in the Congress can be found below. 

 

 

 

Prior Statements and Releases

UPDATE 17- After Two Years, Zakka’s Health Continues to Deteriorate

Statement on the Continued Unlawful Detention of Internet Freedom Advocate & Hostage Nizar Zakka

This week marks the second year that Internet freedom advocate Nizar Zakka has been unlawfully detained in Iran after being invited by Iranian authorities to speak at an ICT Conference.

The following update is from Mr. Zakka’s family regarding his current health situation, which continues to deteriorate.

We continue to hope and pray for Nizar’s prompt release from Evin Prison. Nizar has lost more than 70 pounds, continues to suffer from several health ailments, and now he has a very serious gum infection that requires surgery. For reasons that we do not know, Evin prison officials refuse to provide Nizar with the medical attention that he needs. Using health as a weapon is cruel and a violation of human rights.

To secure medical care, Evin Prison guards have even asked Nizar to sign forms in the Persian language, a language that he does not understand. Nizar will not sign these forms because he fears that his jailers may be trying to, again, force Nizar to sign a confession for crimes that he did not commit. We ask that anyone in a position to do so, please help Nizar secure his freedom so that he can be reunited with his family and get the health care that he desperately needs.

Mr. Zakka traveled to Iran in September 2015, at the invitation of Iran’s Vice President for Women and Family Affairs Shahindokht Molaverdi, to speak at a conference on the use of technology and the Internet to promote social, economic, and educational development in the region. After the conference, en route to the airport, Mr. Zakka was taken by persons believed to be associated with the IRGC’s Basij or the intelligence services.

Mr. Zakka has been denied the right to review the charges or evidence against him and his lawyers have not been allowed to mount a proper defense. Despite the ordeal, including psychological and physical torture, Nizar has maintained his innocence. 

 

More information about Mr. Zakka’s case can be found below.

 

Matter of Nizar Zakka – Hostage in Iran (YouTube)

 

Prior Statements and Releases